OH SupCo: Doc apology not evidence of malpractice

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that sympathetic statements by a doctor over a patient’s unexpected medical outcome can’t be admitted as evidence in medical malpractice cases filed after Sept. 13, 2004.

That’s the effective date of a statute outlawing use of such statements in court.

In a unanimous decision Tuesday, justices reversed an 11th District Court of Appeals ruling that had allowed such a “medical apology” to be admitted in a 2007 suit that involved gall bladder surgery conducted in 2001, before the law went into effect.

Justices said the law clearly applied the prohibition to suits filed after the effective date.

The case involved complications in the surgery of Portage County resident Jeanette Johnson. She sought to admit a statement by her doctor, Randall Smith, taking “full responsibility.”

WKBN 27 First News provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. No links will be permitted. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s