Lawyers arguing over CMU’s $1.17B patent verdict

PITTSBURGH (AP) — Attorneys for Carnegie Mellon University and a California firm were continuing to argue whether a judge should reduce a jury’s $1.17 billion verdict in favor of the school.

The verdict against Marvell Technology Group of Santa Clara, Calif., came in December, after the Pittsburgh-based university argued Marvell infringed on patents that came from the work of professor Jose Moura and then-student Alek Kavcic.

A two-day motions hearing was continuing Thursday before a federal judge in Pittsburgh.

CMU attorneys are defending the verdict, saying that Marvell will still make a $4 billion profit on semiconductor chips that used the patented information if the company pays the full verdict. Marvell’s attorneys argue the judge should reduce the verdict based on how many of the chips were used in the United States and other factors.

WKBN 27 First News provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. No links will be permitted. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s