WASHINGTON (AP) – The Justice Department on Wednesday announced revised guidelines for obtaining records from the news media during criminal leak investigations, removing language that news organizations said was ambiguous and requiring additional levels of review before a journalist can be subpoenaed.
The updated policy revises protocols announced last year amid outrage among news organizations over Obama administration tactics.
The new guidelines come just days after the Justice Department formally abandoned a years-long effort to compel a New York Times reporter to testify in the trial of a former CIA officer accused of disclosing classified information. The actions, taken together, are signs of a more modulated approach for an administration long criticized for its aggressive handling of leak cases.
“These revised guidelines strike an appropriate balance between law enforcement’s need to protect the American people and the news media’s role in ensuring the free flow of information,” Attorney General Eric Holder said Wednesday.
The Justice Department began reviewing its own longstanding guidelines in 2013 and last February issued new rules designed to give news organizations an opportunity to challenge subpoenas or search warrants in federal court. But news organizations expressed concern that the protections applied only to journalists involved in “ordinary newsgathering activities,” language they said was vague and could be exploited by zealous prosecutors.
That provision has been deleted in the new guidelines, which also require the attorney general in most instances to authorize subpoenas issued for the media and for the Justice Department’s criminal division to also be consulted.
“We are very pleased the Justice Department took our concerns seriously and implemented changes that will strengthen the protection of journalists for years to come, with the public being the ultimate beneficiary,” said AP President and CEO Gary Pruitt.
AP General Counsel Karen Kaiser praised the changes for eliminating “potential ambiguity of what constitutes newsgathering and help provide consistency in how the guidelines are interpreted across investigations and administrations.”
The guidelines could “play an even more important role” now in protecting source confidentiality since the Supreme Court last year passed up a chance to provide clarity on the issue and Congress has yet to enact a federal reporter shield law, said Bruce Brown, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
“To have a strong policy like this that presumes so much in favor of reporter/source confidentiality is a very significant turn of events,” he said.
The Obama administration has been criticized for bringing more leak cases than all predecessors combined, with media organizations particularly critical of maneuvers they said were needlessly aggressive and intrusive into newsgathering operations.
Under Holder, the department secretly subpoenaed telephone records from Associated Press reporters and editors during an investigation into a 2012 story about a foiled terror plot, and obtained a search warrant for the emails of a Fox News journalist as part of another probe.
But in the last year, the twilight of Holder’s six-year tenure as attorney general, the department has shown signs of softening its stance.
Holder, for one, has publicly expressed regret for the actions in the Fox News case and has repeatedly said no journalist would go to jail under his watch for doing his or her job.
Last month, the Justice Department said it would no longer try to force New York Times reporter James Risen to reveal his sources in the trial of ex-CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling, which opened this week in Virginia. On Monday, prosecutors formally announced that they were abandoning efforts to seek any testimony from him after they said Risen made it clear that he “will not answer questions that go to the heart of the case.”
Lucy Dalglish, dean of the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland, said any shift in Justice Department practice should not be mistaken as a newfound sign of benevolence for the news media. Instead, federal prosecutors are aware that a subpoena to a journalist inevitably causes prolonged court fights and a public-relations bruising, and so have looked for other ways to build criminal cases against leakers.
“It’s time-consuming, it’s expensive, it takes your attention away from what you’re trying to accomplish,” she said of going after journalists “And I believe that, in recent years, they have become more confident that they can handle these cases without cooperation from journalists.”
But, she added, “If they didn’t think they had the tools to pull off these investigations, they wouldn’t be giving the media a break.”
(Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)