Judge trims ‘Blurred Lines’ song dispute verdict to $5.3M

FILE - In this Saturday, June 27, 2015 file photo, singer Pharrell Williams performs on the Pyramid Stage at Glastonbury music festival at Worthy Farm, Glastonbury, England. A federal judge in Los Angeles on Tuesday, July 14, 2015, trimmed a copyright infringement verdict against Robin Thicke and Williams over their 2013 hit "Blurred Lines" from nearly $7.4 million to $5.3 million. The ruling also gives Marvin Gaye's family, which sued the singers over the song, an ongoing shared of royalties from "Blurred Lines." (Photo by Jim Ross/Invision/AP, File)
FILE - In this Saturday, June 27, 2015 file photo, singer Pharrell Williams performs on the Pyramid Stage at Glastonbury music festival at Worthy Farm, Glastonbury, England. A federal judge in Los Angeles on Tuesday, July 14, 2015, trimmed a copyright infringement verdict against Robin Thicke and Williams over their 2013 hit "Blurred Lines" from nearly $7.4 million to $5.3 million. The ruling also gives Marvin Gaye's family, which sued the singers over the song, an ongoing shared of royalties from "Blurred Lines." (Photo by Jim Ross/Invision/AP, File)

LOS ANGELES (AP) – A judge on Tuesday trimmed more than $2 million from a verdict against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams over their hit “Blurred Lines,” but Marvin Gaye’s family will also get a significant share of future earnings from the 2013 hit song.

U.S. District Judge John A. Kronstadt ruled that the copyright infringement verdict a jury reached in March should be cut from nearly $7.4 million to $5.3 million. The judge’s ruling, however, gives Gaye’s family 50 percent of the song’s future royalties.

Kronstadt’s 56-page ruling dealt with several post-trial issues, including a request by Thicke and Williams’ lawyers for a new trial. The judge rejected that motion, and also refused to issue an injunction requested by Gaye’s family that would have temporarily blocked sales and performance of “Blurred Lines.”

The jury in March sided with Gaye’s family, who contended “Blurred Lines” copied Marvin Gaye’s 1977 hit “Got to Give It Up.”

Jurors found that rapper T.I., who received songwriting credit and a share of the royalties, did not commit copyright infringement, but Kronstadt ruled Tuesday that other elements of the jury’s verdict mean he must be included in the judgment.

Howard King, an attorney for Thicke and Williams, said he was still reviewing the ruling and had no immediate comment.

“Mr. Thicke and Williams, and their legal team, among others, went on a public relations campaign after the jury’s verdict criticizing the verdict and saying the evidence did not support the finding of copyright infringement, and did not believe the decision on liability would therefore stand,” the Gaye family’s attorney, Richard Busch, wrote in a statement. “The judge who actually heard all of the evidence disagreed. I am thrilled for the Gaye family, and the thoughtful members of the jury, who had to listen to all of that while remaining silent.”

Busch said he and his team were reviewing the ruling and would discuss options for how the reduction in the verdict would be handled.

Williams is a seven-time Grammy Award winner whose songs that he’s either performed or produced have sold more than 100 million copies worldwide. His hit “Happy” has helped make him a household name, as has his work as a judge on NBC’s singing competition show, “The Voice.”

Williams contended during the trial that he was only trying to mimic the “feel” of Gaye’s late 1970s music and insisted he did not use elements of his idol’s work.

“Blurred Lines,” which was the biggest song of 2013, remains Thicke’s biggest hit.

(Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

WKBN 27 First News provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. No links will be permitted. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s