Juror issued challenge during talks in officer’s trial

A protester is arrested near Bank of America Stadium on Saturday, Aug. 22, 2015, in Charlotte, N.C. Police in North Carolina made plans Saturday for multiple activities while keeping an eye on protests following the mistrial declared in the case of a white police officer accused in the shooting death of an unarmed black man. (Jeff Siner/The Charlotte Observer via AP) MAGS OUT; TV OUT; MANDATORY CREDIT
A protester is arrested near Bank of America Stadium on Saturday, Aug. 22, 2015, in Charlotte, N.C. Police in North Carolina made plans Saturday for multiple activities while keeping an eye on protests following the mistrial declared in the case of a white police officer accused in the shooting death of an unarmed black man. (Jeff Siner/The Charlotte Observer via AP) MAGS OUT; TV OUT; MANDATORY CREDIT

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) – A juror who heard evidence in the trial of a white North Carolina police officer said he challenged his colleagues to determine what an unarmed black man did to lead the defendant to fatally shoot him.

“I wrote on the board: ‘What did Jonathan Ferrell do, and I underlined “do,” to warrant death: 10 shots.’ I had done this because there was nothing that I had seen in the weeks preceding that showed me what he had done,” said juror Moses Wilson, who was one of the jurors who chose to convict Officer Randall Kerrick of voluntary manslaughter.

“And I said that if anyone can show me what he did, I might change my vote – which is going to be for conviction – to acquittal, and every day, that was my challenge,” he said.

After four days of deliberations, the jury was deadlocked, 7-5 on an initial vote and 8-4 on the succeeding three votes. And when Judge Robert C. Ervin asked the jury foreman last Friday if further deliberations would resolve the impasse, the response was no. Ervin then declared a mistrial – a move that sparked protests outside the courthouse and elsewhere. At least two people were arrested.

Wilson said when he first went into deliberations, he didn’t know how he was going to vote. From there, he decided to review his notes and form his opinion.

While the military veteran – Wilson served two tours of Vietnam – and former Boston constable thought the prosecution’s case should have stood, Wilson said he was particularly upset with the defense’s presentation, which he said put Ferrell on trial.

“It became, not what he did, or what they did to him, but more, what he didn’t do, what he should have known what to do, so that the police would not either beat him silly or shoot him,” Wilson said.

Kerrick, who is suspended without pay from the force, fired 12 shots at Ferrell, hitting him 10 times. Prosecutors said nonlethal force should have been used to subdue Ferrell, a former Florida A&M football player, in September 2013. Two officers with Kerrick didn’t fire their guns. One of those officers did use a Taser.

But Kerrick’s attorneys said the officer feared for his life when he shot and killed Ferrell while responding to a breaking-and-entering call.

Wilson pointed to the three elements of voluntary manslaughter described to the jury by Ervin, including whether Kerrick exceeded matching the threat to him by something far more excessive than what was needed to end the threat.

“That’s where we had our problems,” he said,

He said the entire incident amounted to “a night of mistakes” on both sides, but he said the most egregious was that Kerrick didn’t do what he was supposed to do as a police officer.

“You are not the judge. You are not the jury,” he said. “You’re the person who comes to investigate and decide whether a person should be arrested and sent elsewhere.”

(Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

WKBN 27 First News provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. No links will be permitted. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s